Showing posts with label Power Play woes. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Power Play woes. Show all posts

Friday, November 18, 2011

What's Going on in Sioux Town (RW77)

We are off to an ugly start and are looking heavily to Bemidji to "right the ship." Goon cited some statistics and you can take them any way you want, but I think it comes down to three factors: Special Teams, Depth, and Youth.

Special Teams

Green Glasses are off on this one. The Sioux are just terrible on the Power Play. Just... Just Terrible. It's amazing to see BSU be actually worse than the Sioux because the best way to describe the Sioux Powerplay is: Point shot and Time Killer Together Forever. We are back to the endless cycle to point shot routine.

Goon cited another interesting quote that I agree with, but I'm drawing a blank as to whether this quote is in reference to the Power Play but I think it is 150% accurate when used in the Power Play context. The quote was: "It seems like the entire team stands around watching Kristo make plays." I'd love to say that Kristo is too shot prone but take him off the ice and it seems like it takes pulling teeth to get a shot off and when the shot does come, it comes from the point in one of two areas that are usually Kristo shot locations anyways. When the Power Play becomes that predictable it almost seems like the PK team has 8 skaters and a goaltender on the ice and the PP team is basically 1 player.

To beat a dead horse: I wouldn't be too scared of going down a man vs. UND right now.

PK is better and I'm not all too concerned about this. It mostly comes down to bad timing and bad penalties being more a concern than bad PK.

Depth

Brad Schlossman pines for more 3rd and 4th line scoring. But... When you are dressing Senkbeil as a forward, a man (again according to Schlossman) who readily admits that he's never played forward at a high level before, you know you have no depth at forward.

Add into the mix that O'Donnell has been missing time and Grimaldi has what... 4 games or so under his belt and now he's out for at best 12 games (assuming no more bye weeks) and St. Clair can't qualify academically or screwed up somewhere in that path... Well. The Sioux are in trouble.

Yes, the top line is dynamic and great but this isn't the DOT line. They cannot carry the team. In fact, the DOT line couldn't even carry the team.

Youth

They look young and nervous on the ice. They seem to also have deer in the headlights looks to them when they face experienced high end teams. They're desperate early and fall apart late. It's also like the falling apart comes because they put too much into the first period and seem to fade halfway through the second due to fatigue.

Where does Coaching fall into this?

Ok, I'm going to continue to stand up for Hakstol. You can't judge the youth on this team's future by the first half of their freshman year, but it can tell you what is being set up and what to prepare for down the stretch. I think Hakstol is being firm, but realistic with the troops. He's not pressing... yet. Like him or not, he may be due for an off year. Throw out the NC aspect and Hak has led some dynamite teams as of late but even the best of teams have occasional down years. I hope this isn't one of them.

However, I have said this over and over again: In Hak I trust. I will trust him even when we do lose. Even if we lose to teams like UAA or BSU or MSUM.

I also think that these players will improve and they will be good. I'm not sure if there are any great players on the team (even Grimaldi gets a question mark due to health) outside of the first line. But I will forever be optimistic. I will forever bleed Kelly Green. And I will forever yell GO SIOUX!

Wednesday, November 09, 2011

Roll-er-COAST-GRRRRRRRRR!!! (Redwing77)

I originally wrote this during and right after the Friday night game vs. Minnesota. I had to walk away from it these days because I thought my emotion got carried away. I did not remove too much of my passion but I did edit this and move some information around. Enjoy:

What an exciting game.

The first period featured UND coming out guns blazing... shooting blanks but guns blazing anyways. it was up and down. It was exciting. My heart was racing the entire time!

The second period was another story. We started peppering again but then Lamoreaux got rocked and off Ambroz went for contact to the head roughing. And what happened?

The worst major power play I've ever seen that DID NOT involve a short handed goal. It was AWFUL. How often do you see a major power play that has more short handed shots on goal than powerplay shots on goal? Well, this one should be video recorded and everyone should watch it to see how NOT to play on the powerplay. Dell came up big but he was the only Sioux player on the ice for those five minutes.

Powerplay suckitude

This brings me to my major gripe with UND. Their powerplay is just sad. Who is shooting the puck? No one down low. No one center ice. ONLY the point makes the shot. And you can point at Kristo all you want but when he's not on the ice, the shot STILL comes from the point. Perimeter shooting is ok when you try to mix it up and try to get down low. They didn't attempt really the entire major penalty but they did try a few times on a few minor penalties.

I love the fact that they shoot the puck, but they got to get the puck coming towards the net from all angles to enable the possibility of the goaltender getting caught guessing or leaning the wrong way. Right now, if I'm killing penalties, you can almost predict where the shot will come from and crowd the point. I believe this hurt the Sioux a number of times tonight (EDIT: And Saturday night as well).

Officiating Rears its ugly head

Can Marco Hunt be worse than Don Adam? Two phantom penalty calls in the 3rd period alone is enough to bring up this as a viable question. I wish I was at Mariucci and could speak to Lucia. If I could, I'd tell him to tell his players just to fall down when in heavy traffic while carrying the puck. That way they can spend ALL GAME on the powerplay. Hunt lets the game get out of hand and fails to see both sides of the ice... wait a minute, that's part of the Standard Operating procedure for WCHA officials. But hey. As long as each side has equal power play opportunities, no one cares right? It's interesting that, during the game on Brad's live chat (which I cannot do anymore thanks to all the lousy ads and negativity), fans were saying Shepherd was in UND's pocket. You'd think that one ref in each sides' pockets, though unethical, would have evened things out?

Sure, UND has had a few beneficial calls in this game. But I wonder how many of those Minnesota penalties were REALLY penalties? Good LORD I'm anxious for the NCHC so we can get rid of these morons. Then again, will the NCHC refs be any better?

Lackadasical Play

Has the Sioux D found Serratore yet? Have we found a goaltender to play against that isn't going to step up and play the best game of his career yet? How many excuses are we going to have before we start doing the little things well? This team is BETTER than it is playing. Sure, you have your young shooters but no one is shooting but Kristo and Knight. Nelson gets a few shots here and there but heck, I just called out the first line. Time to start really pressing.

Silver Lining? It's early in the season.

Black Lining? We're putting an awful lot of pressure on the boys the second half of the season.

By the way: GOOD GOD our powerplay is awful. Just awful. Just Just awful. You can't feel bad if you do make a mistake against the Sioux and go down a man. They'll probably just bomb it from the point or turn it over and allow your boys to get a good go at Dell.

Minnesota's Improved

I hate to say "I told you so!" but... The recruits were essentially the same during Hill's final year and the team this year is essentially the same save those recruits. What I'm trying to say is this: The only change is Guentzel. And already they're starting to look a lot like... well, the last time Minnesota looked like they did vs. us? Well, they won something in April that we haven't won since 2000. Championships aren't won in October or November so Minnesota has a long ways to go, but they've DEFINITELY improved. So much so that it would be VERY hard NOT to consider Minnesota the most drastically improved team in the WCHA... that's saying something with MTU looking like...well looking like they're actually a hockey team.

In this case, I hate being right, but really... the ONLY real difference is Guentzel and it shows just how sucktastic a coach John Hill was. This brings my new musing: If Guentzel had been hired at UAA instead of Hill when Hill was hired... would UAA still have been a joke cellar dweller that MSUM seems to have become nowadays? Something tells me that UAA might have been better than they were during the Hill years just Hill drove the talent down.

In any case, I'm still not convinced that Patterson is the best goaltender in the WCHA (as a radio commentator or reporter put it), but he did play an amazing game tonight. Also, the Gophers did something that I'm not used to seeing: backchecking. Sure, that has always been their preferred defense of choice over the physical gameplay but this time they were really effective.

The Gophers tried to raise their physicality as well but the officials made it hard for them to do so without paying the price as well as some of their younger players showed their inexperience (see Ambroz).

All in all, this wasn't a game of domination by either team. In the end, it was a game where Minnesota just played better than we did when it mattered the most.

The Sioux need to stay out of the box and, until we figure out how to play a man up, so does our opponent so we can start generating some better scoring chances. Right now, it's not working. Right now, we can't hit the net where the goaltender isn't and when we have the opportunity, we can't corral the puck long enough to shoot it in.

A very aggravating loss and perhaps the harshness of this post is fueled by it.
Enhanced by Zemanta