Showing posts with label NCAA Ice Hockey Rules Comittee. Show all posts
Showing posts with label NCAA Ice Hockey Rules Comittee. Show all posts

Tuesday, June 21, 2011

NCAA Ice hockey panel clarifies rules

University of North Dakota Fighting Sioux athl...Image via WikipediaThis was tweeted over on twitter. The NCAA Ice Hockey Committee looked to clarify the rule regarding head shots. It’s good that the NCAA is going to look at this rule more closely. I do see one problem with this clarification though; it’s going to take more legal hitting out of the college hockey game. This could in essence take a lot of the open ice hits out of the game of college hockey, I would be willing to bet we will see shoulder to shoulder contact penalized.
Ty Halpin; NCAA.org ---- The committee did approve several items of guidance for officials to build on the successful implementation of its rules for contact to the head.

“Progress was certainly made this season,” said Ed McLaughlin, athletics director at Niagara University and chair of the committee. “We are adding some additional guidance to support what is already in our rules in the hope that players, coaches and officials can better understand expectations with this rule.”

In some cases, officials were hesitant to enforce the contact to the head because they were unsure if a player had clearly “targeted” an opponent. The committee reinforced that targeting is not a prerequisite for this rule to be used.

Added to the examples of the type of play the committee hopes to remove are players who are reckless, players who are about to receive a pass and direct contact to the head or neck area from any direction. This additional guidance joins several other bullet points already printed in the rules book.

The committee also points the hockey community to language that already appears in the rules book: “A player delivering a check to an unsuspecting and vulnerable player puts themselves in jeopardy of being penalized under this rule.”

“We believe our rule is the most robust and aggressive in ice hockey,” McLaughlin said. “What we saw this year was a good start. We’re trying to take any doubt out of this call and help officials who have only one game-speed view of a play to determine how to officiate this play. We realize this is a big penalty and a serious one, but this approach has worked with hitting from behind and we believe it will work here to adjust player behavior.”
Also from the NCAA Ice Hockey Rules Comittee, elbellishmet is also going to be another area of emphasis, I applaud that decision, “Diving and embellishment erode the integrity of our game and must be eliminated.” I say right on! Hockey in North America is starting to look like European Soccer with all of the diving, if you think I am off the mark, go back and re-watch the 2011 Stanley Cup playoffs again, there was so much diving in the games that the refs got to a point where they couldn’t tell if a player was diving or not and many times failed to call a penalty. Also, not to points fingers but the players of Garrett Roe and Jacob Cepis' ilk, you're on notice, the refs are going to be watching you… Diving is ruining hockey of all levels. Seriously, real hockey players aren't frauds and they don't dive.
Embellishment/diving

In addition to the contact to the head and general emphasis on player safety, the committee received feedback from the coaching community that embellishment/diving seems to be a growing issue. The committee voted to make this a point of emphasis for the upcoming season and plans to include several video examples during preseason clinics.

“Diving and embellishment erode the integrity of our game and must be eliminated,” McLaughlin said. “Trying to deceive officials is unethical and unsporting. This has to be a collaborative effort to make progress.”

The committee decided to provide guidance regarding obstruction along the boards, where the defensive tactic of pressing and releasing an opponent should be allowed, but impeding is not. Again, additional video examples will be used to encourage consistent application of these rules.

Finally, the group points attention again to rules that deal with facewashing, which typically occurs after a stoppage in play. Continued and stringent enforcement of these rules is needed to improve the image of the game.
In case you’re one of the ten people that hasn’t seen it, here is the official press release from the NC$$ on the Fighting Sioux nickname. As you can see the NCAA is not budging and they will probably not change their mind.
NCAA statement on North Dakota mascot issueThe NCAA’s Native American mascot policy remains in effect, and we stand ready to assist the University of North Dakota with its implementation of the policy.

The Big Sky Conference’s position related to the university's Fighting Sioux nickname and logo is consistent with the spirit and intent of the settlement agreement the NCAA reached with the university to retire the nickname and logo.

We have made clear to both the conference and the university that the NCAA has no intention of changing its position.

If the University of North Dakota continues to use the nickname and logo past the August 15 deadline due to state law, it will be subject to the parameters of the policy. This means the university could not host any championships or use the nickname and logo at any championship events.
If you have read this blog for any length of time you will know that I am a big time supporter of the Fighting Sioux nickname. In the future, I plan on getting a Fighting Sioux logo permanently tattooed to my body… It’s the opinion of this writer that the University of North Dakota will never be able to replace this great logo with anything remotely cool. I also believe that we are destined to replace the Fighting Sioux logo with some stupid moniker that will be in essence a capitulation to the people that were offended by the Fighting Sioux logo and nickname.

Moving forward, I also don’t have any faith in the current president of the University of North Dakota, President Robert Kelley is part of the problem, he is a hand wringing liberal elite from the University of Berkley in California who wants to shove his political correctness and beliefs down our throat. That being said I do believe this is the end of the Fighting Sioux nickname, I see no way that it stays past this season.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Sunday, July 04, 2010

McLaughlin Named Chair Of NCAA Hockey Rules Committee

Incase you haven't seen this Ed McLaughling will replace Forrest Karr as Chair of the NCAA Men’s and Women’s Ice Hockey Rules Committee.
INDIANAPOLIS - Niagara University Director of Athletics Ed McLaughlin has been named Chair of the NCAA Men’s and Women’s Ice Hockey Rules Committee. McLaughlin will officially assume his duties on Sept. 1.

“I am honored to serve as the chair of the committee,” McLaughlin said. “I look forward to working with my colleagues on the rules committee and the NCAA staff to make college hockey the best it can be.”

McLaughlin has been a member on the rules committee since September 2008 and will serve the final two years as chair of the committee. As chair, McLaughlin will coordinate and run all committee meetings, conference calls and presentations to coaching associations, administrators and officiating groups. The chair is also authorized to speak on behalf of the committee and NCAA on any issues related to the committee’s work.
[Purple Eagles]
BallHype: hype it up!

Thursday, June 17, 2010

Wheels are in motion - Icing rule could die

Here is an email that I got from Forrest Karr in response to my an earlier email that I sent to the NCAA Ice Hockey Rules Committee. It would appear that the NCAA Ice Hockey Rules Committee has blinked in regard to the ice rule that doesn't allow a penalized team to ice the puck when they are killing a penalty.
The committee actually voted to forward 22 proposals to
the Playing Rules Oversight Panel. I think this is important as most
of these proposals have overwhelming support from the coaching body.
The Committee also voted to forward two points of emphasis, three
experimental rules and two future considerations.

Over the past two days, Ty Halpin (NCAA), Ed McLaughlin (Director of
Athletics at Niagara University and incoming Rules Committee Chair)
and I have participated on conference calls with the five men's DI
commissioners, the CCHA coaches, and the ECAC coaches. Ed also
participated on a call with the Atlantic Hockey coaches. These calls
were productive and should benefit college hockey in the future.

The coaches wanted to know how they can influence the icing proposal's
fate. We told them that a form will be sent out today (Thursday, June
17, 2010) and that they will have until July 2, 2010 to comment on any
proposals. At that point, the Rules Committee will have an opportunity
to review the feedback and get together on a conference call before
deciding which final proposals will be forwarded to the Playing Rules
Oversight Panel.

Regarding the icing rule, we anticipate one of the following four results:
1) The Rules Committee decides not to advance the proposal to enforce
icing when teams are shorthanded,
2) The Rules Committee decides to advance the proposal with the
modification that a shorthanded team icing the puck is allowed to
change players,
3) The Rules Committee reviews the feedback and decides to move
forward with the proposal as voted upon originally, or
4) The Rules Committee decides to advance the proposal as an
experimental rule for the 2010-12 rule book.

Any of these results are acceptable and we are not advocating for a
specific result. We hope that participation in the next phase is high so the
committee has the best possible data to fine tune final proposals
before moving them forward. The committee is working hard to make the
game better and to reach the best conclusions given the information
received.
BallHype: hype it up!

Monday, June 14, 2010

We can't let this stand...

The NCAA ice hockey rules committee’s proposed some rules changes for the 2010-11 season that have not been well received by the fans and or coaches. In fact the proposed rule changes have many of us scratching our heads. Personally, I have a lot of feeling regarding these changes; many of them are in coarse/foul language so I won’t post them here. I posted a list of the names and their email addresses in a previous blog post of the morons people that are responsible for this travesty.

Feel free to send them an email and tell them how you feel about their moronic changes that they have proposed to our great sport of college hockey. I would refrain from using demeaning language or swearing at them. Just tell them that you don’t appreciate what they have proposed to the great game of college hockey. All kidding aside and shooting from the hip these people have proposed changes that will ruin our great game of college hockey, the status quo was fine, these proposed changes are horrible and these people need to be kicked off of the NCAA Ice Hockey Rules Committee before they do anymore unbearable damage to the game of hockey.

Links to the Story

My opinion on proposed NCAA hockey rules changes [Parting Schotts]

Proposed NCAA Hockey Rules Changes Not Good for Sport [Fan House]

News - NCAA Ice Hockey Rules Committee Proposes Changes to Strengthen Contact To Head Rules [CCHA.COM]

Ice hockey panel proposes stricter contact rules [NC$$.COM]

NCAA Rule Changes 2010-11 [Rink and Run]

Proposed NCAA ice hockey rule changes [Michigan Hockey Net]

Share NCAA Proposed Rule Changes [Western College Hockey]

NCAA rules proposals bad for hockey [Red Hawkey]

Rules Proposals Address Head Shots, Icing [Inside College Hockey]

Serratore against proposed rules adjustments to college hockey [Bemidji Pioneer]

Questioning the Rules Change Proposal [College Hockey News]

Rules Changes: Proposal Makes Contact to Head a Major [College Hockey News]

No icing when shorthanded? [UND Hockey Blog]

College hockey: Coaches upset over proposals [Grand Forks Herald]

BallHype: hype it up!