Friday, May 29, 2009

More UNO conference talk.

This is what Trev Alberts had to say about UNO's possible switch to the WCHA. Ah yes! More talk about the Big Ten Hockey Conference. The pipe dream that just won’t go away, there has been discussions and more discussions about the Big Ten Hockey Conference since at least during the early 1990’s and where are we at now? I would guarantee UNO that if there ever was the formation of the Big Ten Hockey Conference the WCHA would be a better league to be in. Imagine the CCHA without OSU, Michigan and Michigan State, what teams do you have after that? You have Notre Dame, NMU and Miami. If Minnesota and Wisconsin leave the WCHA you have some solid teams that are going to fold and can still put butts in seats.
Also Thursday, Alberts said UNO is continuing to discuss its hockey conference affiliation with both the Central Collegiate Hockey Association and the Western Collegiate Hockey Association. The WCHA is looking to add two teams, and Bemidji State has already applied.

"We have had sound conversations and negotiations with both leagues," Alberts said. "We're happy with what the CCHA has done for us. We realize the WCHA can provide some things the CCHA can't. The Big Ten might start (sponsoring) hockey. How does that affect us? How do we position ourselves? We can't think short-term, we have to think long-term."




BallHype: hype it up!

1 comment:

  1. I'm probably in the minority (perhaps short minded) thinking the B10 hockey conference is fine with me. A combined "leftover" conference of UND, Miami, DU, CC, NMU, SCSU and Duluth (all just for starters) would be extremely competitive. Figure Notre Dame goes with the B10 conference.

    ReplyDelete