Friday, July 11, 2008

The NCAA approves proposed changes.


The new rules that were proposed earlier this spring have now been approved by the NCAA ice hockey committee. Seriously, I will believe it when I see it because; it is just like any other rule or law. A governing body can make all the rules they want to, however, for the new rules to be affective, they need to be enforced or the new rules will be useless. I am thinking the latter is going to happen in the WCHA. While some people don't like it when people refer to the WCHA as being the Western Obstruction League (copy right PCM), or complain about the officiating in the WCHA is very poor and is not working anymore. The WCHA and the NCAA hockey have become less watchable. The brutal reality is that the obstruction in the WCHA is so bad that it has caused the WCHA to become the Neutral Trap Zone league or the no scoring league. I don’t go to a hockey game to watch teams obstruct, hack and slash the opposition’s star players up and down the ice I come to watch fast paced exciting action with a lot of hard hitting and an occasional scrap.

Ok, the rules are on the book but the 64,000.00 question is; will the WCHA leader ship be able to put the new rules into action. I believe it can not happen until the WCHA leadership gets out of this incorrect/incoherent mind set that the status quo in the WCHA is half the reason scoring is down last year? A player no matter how skilled he is can not score with a gorilla I mean an opposing player is draped all over him. The laws of physics won’t allow it. An offensive player must be allowed to move freely without being obstructed. Obstruction by the rules books is not allowed and needs to be called.

Lastly, I think the officials in the WCHA are the worst in division one hockey. Personally, I do not believe that the WCHA has enough qualified or quality officials to be able to have two competent officials to ref each game. So it is time for the WCHA to get on board or prepare to hear more complaining and complaints from the fans in the WCHA.


NCAA approves changes to rules
Brad Elliott Schlossman Grand Forks Herald
Published Friday, July 11, 2008

The rules changes in college hockey are now official. There will be two referees and two linesmen on the ice next season and they have been instructed to be stricter in protecting the puck carrier from obstruction, the NCAA announced Thursday.


Not allowing a team to change lines after icing the puck. If a defensive-zone team knocks the net off, it won’t be allowed to change, either.

- Icing will be waved off if the referee determines a pass is attainable by a player on the attacking side of the red line. “Attainable” is defined as a pass on the ice and within a stick-length of the player.

- The NCAA is recommending, but not requiring, all arenas to increase the size of the offensive zone. It is asking arenas to move the goal line 11 feet from the end boards. It is currently 15 feet away. The NCAA wants the offensive zone to be 64 feet.

“The committee believes game officials have held a strong standard of obstruction fouls away from the puck carrier in recent seasons,” the NCAA stated in a release. “In reviewing how the game is being called at other levels, it has become apparent that more emphasis needs to be placed on the puck carrier and allowing players to showcase offensive creativity and skill.”

The Western Collegiate Hockey Association set a scoring futility mark for the fourth consecutive season in 2007-08. But several changes have been made to try to change that trend. Others are:

Adding an “embellishment” penalty.

- Clarifying pucks that go in off of skates. They are to be allowed unless it is controlled, kicked or guided into the net with a skate. If the player is in the act of stopping, it is OK. When in doubt, a goal will be disallowed.

- Delaying an offsides whistle if the goalie plays the puck. In the past, the whistle was automatically blown right away.

- Forcing all players, including backup goaltenders, to wear helmets on the bench

4 comments:

  1. I like how you clarified for us that its the $64,000 question, not the $64,000.27 question ;)

    Also, I will do my bitching once the refs start screwing things up again. Doing something is better than leaving things alone and letting them fester. I do like the no-change icing, though it will cause many a problem when stupid coaches try to change players anyway

    ReplyDelete
  2. Fantastic! Instead of having only one ref to eff up the call, we now have two.

    I've got to believe that during the coaches meetings in Florida this spring, a main topic of discussion (or maybe "THE topic of conversation") had to be the state of officiating within the conference. I don't know who McCleoud ultimately answers to? I assume that the 10 ADs of the league. Hopefully it was made clear to McClown that he's on his last leg to clean up the mess that is WCHA officiating. What an embarrassing year it was for the WCHA officials last year. Another thing while I'm ranting; I'm 100% serious about this, did Randy Schmidt get drug tested after his second momentous eff up last season? How else could his ginormous blunders be explained?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Boosh, very funny :) I think most of us agree except the WCHA leadership that their officals are buch of morons. The schmidt screw ups are horrible and unexcuseable.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Any news on the CHA conference keeping it's auto-bid, I know that it was proposed, but I haven't seen any official word.

    ReplyDelete