UMD: Also in the Super League mix…

Image via WikipediaIt would seem that the plot is thickening. UMD beat writer Kevin Pates from the Duluth News Tribune has informed us that the defending national champions the UMD Bulldogs are also in the mix for the Super Conference as well. We could say that UMD is also being proactive; they are trying to do what is best for their University going forward.

Rink and Run --- Minnesota Duluth has been asked to join a discussion of a proposed seven- or eight-team Division I men’s conference, which would likely start in 2013-14, sources indicate.

The conference: UMD, North Dakota, Denver, Colorado College and Nebraska-Omaha of the Western Collegiate Hockey Association, and Miami University of Oxford, Ohio and Notre Dame of South Bend, Ind., and possibly Western Michigan of Kalamazoo, Mich., all of the Central Collegiate Hockey Association.

There’s talk that a resolution on a new Super League could come in July or by Labor Day. The current 12-team WCHA already has schedules for the next two seasons.

The restructuring of Division I conferences is being investigated by a number of schools in reaction to the formation of the Big Ten Conference, announced in March. Starting in 2013-14, Wisconsin and Minnesota will leave the WCHA, while Michigan, Michigan State and Ohio State will leave the CCHA, and join Penn State in the six-team Big Ten Conference.

While it’s unknown who is leading the charge to form an eight-team Super Conference, Denver and North Dakota are likely candidates. While UMD athletic director Bob Nielson wouldn’t talk specifically Tuesday about a Super Conference, he said his school isn’t standing still.

If you read between the lines there seems to be a lot of stuff being said here and I wonder if any of this is being received by the league office of the WCHA. Let’s not kid ourselves, it’s going to be hard to put the genie back in the bottle once all of these things have been said and done as well. There seems to be a schism developing here.

Here is what I also think is key and driving this realignment chatter and one of the major reasons for the proposed talk about a move to a “Super Conference.” There are schools like UND, UMD, UNO, DU, and C.C. that see the writing on the wall or they probably don't like the direction the WCHA and college hockey is currently going but also more likely than not have questions about the WCHA leadership and direction of where they think the league is going. I think many fans do as well.

Since the announcement of the Big Ten Hockey Conference all we have heard from the Commissioner's office is that he wants to have a scheduling agreement with the schools that are leaving for the Big Ten, that’s about it.

I also believe that the schools in the mix for this Super Conference are trying to be proactive and want to align themselves with other schools that have similar philosophies like their own when it comes to college hockey… Also, it would appear that these schools might be upset with the current leadership in their conferences as well. If you look at what UMD athletic director Bob Nielson said, “His views mirror comments made by North Dakota athletic director Brian Faison…”

While it’s unknown who is leading the charge to form an eight-team Super Conference, Denver and North Dakota are likely candidates. While UMD athletic director Bob Nielson wouldn’t talk specifically Tuesday about a Super Conference, he said his school isn’t standing still.

“We’re concerned about the college hockey landscape. We’re looking at all the options of what could happen,” said Nielson. “Our hockey program is very important to our school and we want to be proactive.

“Our approach is to be active and examine potential opportunities, and have conversations about the future of Division I. Our intent is to be a member of the WCHA, but we’re considering options.”

Speculation about a Super Conference started in April and intensified last week when the Grand Forks Herald reported that North Dakota was weighing options about leaving the WCHA.

Nielson said his views mirror comments made by North Dakota athletic director Brian Faison in the Grand Forks Herald:

This is what UND Athletic Director Brian Faison said as well...

Faison told the Herald that he has concerns with “the administrative side of the WCHA.” So perhaps this is all a big power play.

Finally -> As you can see from the comment above, another question that is starting to emerge as well; is this a big power play? Here is the latest tweet from College Hockey News.

All the new "super conference" talk is likely a power play to get a management change in the WCHA ... CHN has more forthcoming

Edit: Just for the record I would gladly take a WCHA without Bruce McLeod at the helm and with Miami and Notre Dame added to the Mix… All I can say is stay tuned....

Remaking college hockey, what’s driving the bus?

Image via WikipediaIt would appear that Fighting Sioux hockey beat writer Brad Schlossman with his article written July 1st, 2011 titled; COLLEGE HOCKEY: UND weighing hockey league options, has started the proverbial crap storm… With these potential changes there seems to be a lot of uncertainty and uneasiness surrounding the college hockey world  right now and there are a lot of college hockey fans that are worried about future state of the WCHA and the Division I college hockey as well. I have to admit that I am one of those people that are feeling uneasy about the future as well. 

Lots of finger pointing

That being said, there has been a lot of finger pointing since Brad’s revelations were made public and I don’t think it’s fair for WCHA fans to put all of the blame on the shoulders of the University of North Dakota, the Big Ten also shares some of the blame as well. First we don’t know yet what is driving this bus nor do we know for sure that UND is the sole driving force behind the realignment talk, I think it's still to early to tell. According to Brad's article, there are also seven other Division I college hockey teams involved in this process.

From reading the college hockey message boards like USCHO and reading the various beat writer’s  responses to Brad’s article; it would almost appear this is shaking out to be a battle between "the haves" and "the have nots" of college hockey, just like the other major Division I college sports, the big schools do for the most part drive college hockey… I guess college hockey finally has come full circle like the rest of the college  sports. This is what the Shane Frederick of the Mankato Free Press had to say, I think you’re going to find this interesting.

Other WCHA schools mentioned in the article include Nebraska-Omaha and Colorado College, along with Central Collegiate Hockey Association members Notre Dame, Miami and Western Michigan (the CCHA is losing Michigan, Michigan State and Ohio State to the Big Ten, which will also have Penn State).

Denver was not listed in the article but is often mentioned any time a rumor of a new power conference comes up.

“Several institutions have been looking at the college hockey landscape and different possibilities that might be out there,” North Dakota athletic director Brian Faison told the Herald. “At the end of the day we have to do what’s in the best interest of UND hockey, and that’s what we’re going to do. It’s an emotional decision. It’s a business decision.”

Killing the golden goose that is the WCHA sure doesn’t seem to be in the best interest of any school in the league — or of college hockey, for that matter.

Such a move would fragment the fan base of a sport that is still pretty niche, especially compared to Division I football and basketball. And those fans pay the freight.

Puck-crazy Minnesota — the self-proclaimed State of Hockey — would be thrown out of the mix completely, and there’s a reason why the successful, money-making WCHA Final Five has been played in the Twin Cities each year since 1999.

Brad Schlossman also expounds on his July 1st article with another blog post today… Brad’s blog post covers a lot of the same topics as Shane Fredericks said in his newspaper article today…

At this time, most of the answers have been vague, being that this possible new conference is not a done deal. But in searching for answers, I thought back to something that one person — who has an affiliation with the league — told me last summer after the Big 10 became inevitable.

This person said that when business was conducted in the WCHA, often times, there was a distinct divide in the voting. The larger schools wanted to invest and spend money to make improvements and try new things in the league. The smaller schools had budget concerns and wanted to/needed to save money.

However, there were enough big schools in the league that they held the power and, more often than not, got their way with these issues. Without Minnesota and Wisconsin, the dynamics of the league will change. No longer do the large schools hold the power. Now, the small schools will gain control of the voting block.

It’s entirely possible that the CCHA is going through a similar type of process after the losses of Michigan, Michigan State and Ohio State.

If this is true, the remaining schools that are used to voting to spend, invest and make new improvements have to be concerned about the future of the league. What will it become if schools that are more financially strapped become the decision-makers in the league?

You've probably noticed an emerging and reoccurring theme here, the WCHA has a leadership problem in the commissioner’s office. I think one might ask if it’s time for Bruce McLeod to step down as commissioner of the WCHA? The WCHA is going to need strong leadership going forward with two of the big schools leaving the WCHA (Wisconsin and Minnesota)... Personally I don't have a lot of confidence i McLeod as commissioner and I believe with McLeod the league office is suffering a leadership void, that needs to be filled. This was also from Frederick's article today.

What would remain of the WCHA would essentially be the Northern Sun Intercollegiate Conference — Minnesota State, St. Cloud State, Minnesota Duluth (the defending national champions) and Bemidji State — plus Michigan Tech and Alaska Anchorage.

The leaders of the WCHA, including and especially commissioner Bruce McLeod, can’t allow this — essentially the demise of a great and historic hockey conference — to happen on their watch.

Faison told the Herald that he has concerns with “the administrative side of the WCHA.” So perhaps this is all a big power play.

But this has gone beyond the spring rumors of a “Super Six” conference. The Herald reported that, because of scheduling, all of this might have to play out by late summer or early fall.

Could it be the end of the WCHA as we know it?

If so, it would not feel fine.